Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945


This is pretty good. It is always the reviewer #3 who just doesn't understand the groundbreaking work that we do. Perhaps, that is why many journals now use only two reviewers.

Professor | Writer | Teacher Digital Innovation, Design, Organizational Genetics Case Western Reserve University

One thought on “Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: