Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945

via www.youtube.com

This is pretty good. It is always the reviewer #3 who just doesn't understand the groundbreaking work that we do. Perhaps, that is why many journals now use only two reviewers.

Advertisements

One thought on “Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.