via www.youtube.com
This is pretty good. It is always the reviewer #3 who just doesn't understand the groundbreaking work that we do. Perhaps, that is why many journals now use only two reviewers.
Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945
via www.youtube.com
This is pretty good. It is always the reviewer #3 who just doesn't understand the groundbreaking work that we do. Perhaps, that is why many journals now use only two reviewers.